Crude Steel Production

Crude Steel Production in September 2024

In September 2024, the world crude steel production for the 71 countries reporting to the World Steel Association (world steel) was 143.6 million tonnes (Mt), a 4.7% decrease from September 2023.

crude steel production

crude steel production

Crude steel production by region

Africa produced 1.9 Mt in September 2024, up 2.6% on September 2023. Asia and Oceania produced 105.3 Mt, down 5.0%. The EU (27) produced 10.5 Mt, up 0.3%. Europe, Other produced 3.6 Mt, up 4.1%. The Middle East produced 3.5 Mt, down 23.0%. North America produced 8.6 Mt, down 3.4%. Russia & other CIS + Ukraine produced 6.8 Mt, down 7.6%. South America produced 3.5 Mt, up 3.3%.

Table 1. Crude steel production by region

Region Sep 2024 (Mt) % change Sep 24/23 Jan-Sep 2024 (Mt) % change Jan-Sep 24/23
Africa 1.9 2.6 16.6 2.3
Asia and Oceania 105.3 -5 1,032.00 -2.5
EU (27) 10.5 0.3 97.8 1.5
Europe, Other 3.6 4.1 33.1 7.8
Middle East 3.5 -23 38.4 -1.5
North America 8.6 -3.4 80 -3.9
Russia & other CIS + Ukraine 6.8 -7.6 64.9 -2.5
South America 3.5 3.3 31.4 0
Total 71 countries 143.6 -4.7 1,394.10 -1.9

The 71 countries included in this table accounted for approximately 98% of total world crude steel production in 2023.

Regions and countries covered by the table:

  • Africa: Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, South Africa, Tunisia
  • Asia and Oceania: Australia, China, India, Japan, Mongolia, New Zealand, Pakistan, South Korea, Taiwan (China), Thailand, Vietnam
  • European Union (27): Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden
  • Europe, Other: Macedonia, Norway, Serbia, Türkiye, United Kingdom
  • Middle East: Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
  • North America: Canada, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, United States
  • Russia & other CIS + Ukraine: Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine
  • South America: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela

Top 10 steel-producing countries

China produced 77.1 Mt in September 2024, down 6.1% on September 2023. India produced 11.7 Mt, down 0.2%. Japan produced 6.6 Mt, down 5.8%. The United States produced 6.7 Mt, up 1.2%. Russia is estimated to have produced 5.6 Mt, down 10.3%. South Korea produced 5.5 Mt, up 1.3%. Germany produced 3.0 Mt, up 4.3%. Türkiye produced 3.1 Mt, up 6.5%. Brazil produced 2.8 Mt, up 9.9%. Iran is estimated to have produced 1.5 Mt, down 41.2%.

Table 2. Top 10 steel-producing countries

Region  Sep 2024 (Mt) % change Sep 24/23 Jan-Sep 2024 (Mt) % change Jan-Sep 24/23
China 77.1 -6.1 768.5 -3.6
India 11.7 -0.2 110.3 5.8
Japan 6.6 -5.8 63.3 -3.2
United States 6.7 1.2 60.3 -1.6
Russia 5.6 e -10.3 54 -5.5
South Korea 5.5 1.3 48.1 -4.6
Germany 3 4.3 28.4 4
Türkiye 3.1 6.5 27.9 13.8
Brazil 2.8 9.9 25.2 4.4
Iran 1.5 e -41.2 21.3 -3.1

e – estimated. Ranking of the top 10 producing countries is based on year-to-date aggregate

API 5L vs ISO 3183

Know the Differences: API 5L vs ISO 3183

ISO 3183 and API 5L are standards related to steel pipes, primarily for use in the oil, gas, and other fluid transportation industries. While there is significant overlap between these two standards, API 5L vs ISO 3183, key differences exist in their scope, application, and the organizations behind them.

1. Issuing Organizations: API 5L vs ISO 3183

API 5L: Issued by the American Petroleum Institute (API), this standard is primarily used in the oil and gas industry. It details the technical requirements for steel pipes transporting oil, gas, and water.
ISO 3183: Issued by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), this standard is internationally recognized and used globally for steel pipes in the oil and gas transportation sector.

2. Scope of Application: API 5L vs ISO 3183

API 5L: Covers steel pipes for transporting petroleum, natural gas, and other fluids under high pressure. It is widely used in North America, especially in the United States.
ISO 3183: This standard primarily focuses on the design, manufacture, and quality control of steel pipes used in oil and gas pipelines, but its use is more international and applicable in various countries worldwide.

3. Key Differences: API 5L vs ISO 3183

Geographic and Market Focus:

API 5L is more tailored to the North American market (particularly the U.S.), while ISO 3183 is internationally applicable and used in many countries worldwide.

Steel Grades and Requirements:

API 5L defines steel grades like L175, L210, L245, and so on, where the number represents the minimum yield strength in megapascals (MPa).
ISO 3183 also defines similar grades but with more detailed requirements regarding material properties, manufacturing processes, and inspection protocols, aligning with international industry practices.
Additional Specifications:
API 5L emphasizes quality control, certification, and production requirements, whereas ISO 3183 covers a broader scope, with international trade in mind, and provides specifications for different conditions, including temperature, environment, and specific mechanical requirements.

4. Technical Requirements: API 5L vs ISO 3183

API 5L specifies steel pipes’ material properties, manufacturing processes, dimensions, testing methods, and quality control. It defines steel grades from L (low strength) to X grades (higher strength), such as X42, X60, and X70.
ISO 3183 covers similar aspects of steel pipe manufacture, including material quality, heat treatment, surface treatment, and pipe ends. It also provides detailed specifications for pipeline design pressure, environmental considerations, and various pipeline accessories.

5. Comparison of Pipe Grades: API 5L vs ISO 3183

API 5L: The grades range from L grades (low yield strength) to X grades (higher yield strength). For example, X60 refers to pipes with a yield strength of 60,000 psi (approximately 413 MPa).
ISO 3183: It uses a similar grading system but may include more detailed classifications and conditions. It also ensures alignment with global pipeline design and operational practices.

6. Compatibility Between Standards:

In many cases, API 5L and ISO 3183 are compatible, meaning that a steel pipe that meets the requirements of API 5L will generally also meet the requirements of ISO 3183 and vice versa. However, specific pipeline projects may adhere to one standard over the other depending on location, client preferences, or regulatory requirements.

7. Conclusion:

API 5L is more common in the United States and surrounding regions. It focuses on the oil and gas pipeline industry, strongly emphasizing production and quality control.
ISO 3183 is an international standard for global oil and gas pipeline projects. Its more detailed, globally aligned requirements ensure broader acceptance in international markets.

Both standards are very similar regarding material, manufacturing, and testing specifications. Still, ISO 3183 tends to have a broader, more globally applicable scope, while API 5L remains more specific to the North American market. The choice between these standards depends on the pipeline project’s geographical location, specifications, and regulatory needs.

3LPE Coated Line Pipes

Successfully Delivered a Batch of Submarine Pipeline Orders for Transporting Gasoline

After a month of intense efforts, our company successfully delivered the subsea oil and gas pipeline order. The successful delivery of this order proved the dedication and expertise of our sales and production teams, despite the harsh meteorological conditions, such as typhoons, encountered during the transport. The order involves the construction of a high-quality and high-standard submarine pipeline project, and the goods will be used in constructing submarine pipelines for oil terminals to connect oil tankers and on-shore storage tanks, aiming at safely transporting oil and gas under the sea.

The specifications of the order are as follows:

  • Outer coating: three-layer polyethylene coating
  • Coating thickness: 2.7mm
  • Coating standard: DIN 30670-2012 N-v
  • Base pipe standard and material: API Spec 5L Grade B
  • Base pipe type: Seamless
  • Size: NPS 6‘ & 8’ x SCH40 x 11.8M
  • Other items: NPS 6‘ & 8’ x SCH40 SORF and WNRF flanges, 90° 5D elbows, 90° long radius elbows, bolts and nuts.
3LPE Coated API 5L Gr.B Line Pipes, 90° Pipe Bends, 90° LR Elbows, SO, BL, WN Flanges,Bolt & Nuts

3LPE Coated API 5L Gr.B Line Pipes, 90° Pipe Bends, 90° LR Elbows, SORF, WNRF Flanges, Bolt & Nuts

We produce the pipes according to API Spec 5L, the anti-corrosion coating according to DIN 30670-2012, the 90° 5D elbows according to ASME B16.49, ISO 15590-1, EN 14870-1, the 90° long radius elbows according to ASME B16.9, and the flanges according to ASME B16.5 to ensure the pipework met the highest safety and performance standards.

Everything is full of uncertainties and interludes, and a happy ending is the ultimate quest. We are proud of our team’s hard work and dedication and look forward to continuing to push the boundaries of the energy infrastructure sector and new pipeline projects.

If you have RFQs about a subsea pipeline project or require high-quality 3LPE/3LPP/FBE/LE anti-corrosion pipelines, please feel free to contact us at [email protected], where our team will provide you with reliable solutions and one-stop services.

Stainless Steel vs Galvanized Steel

Stainless Steel vs Galvanised Steel

Introduction

Stainless Steel vs Galvanized Steel, it’s crucial to consider the environment, required durability, and maintenance needs. Stainless steel offers unmatched corrosion resistance, strength, and visual appeal, making it suitable for demanding applications in harsh environments. Galvanized steel, on the other hand, offers cost-effective corrosion protection for less aggressive settings.

1. Composition and Manufacturing Process

Stainless Steel

Stainless steel is an alloy composed mainly of iron, chromium (at least 10.5%), and sometimes nickel and molybdenum. Chromium forms a protective oxide layer on the surface, giving it excellent corrosion resistance. Different grades, like 304 and 316, vary in alloying elements, providing options for various environments, including extreme temperatures and high salinity.

Galvanized Steel

Galvanized steel is carbon steel coated with a layer of zinc. The zinc layer protects the steel underneath as a barrier against corrosion. The most common galvanizing method is hot-dip galvanizing, where the steel is submerged in molten zinc. Another method is electro-galvanizing, where zinc is applied using an electric current. Both processes enhance corrosion resistance, though they are generally less durable in harsh environments than stainless steel.

2. Corrosion Resistance

Stainless Steel

Stainless steel’s corrosion resistance is inherent due to its alloy composition, which forms a passive chromium oxide layer. Grade 316 stainless steel, which includes molybdenum, provides excellent resistance to corrosion from chlorides, acids, and other aggressive chemicals. It’s a preferred choice in marine, chemical processing, and oil and gas industries, where exposure to corrosive agents is daily.

Galvanized Steel

The zinc layer on galvanized steel provides sacrificial protection; the zinc will corrode before the underlying steel, offering some corrosion resistance. However, this protection is limited, as the zinc layer can degrade over time. While galvanized steel performs adequately in mild environments and general construction, it doesn’t withstand harsh chemicals or saltwater exposure as effectively as stainless steel.

3. Mechanical Properties and Strength

Stainless Steel

Stainless steel is generally more robust than galvanized steel, with higher tensile strength and durability. This makes it ideal for applications that require resilience and reliability under pressure. Stainless steel also offers excellent resistance to impact and wear, which benefits infrastructure and heavy-duty industrial applications.

Galvanized Steel

While galvanized steel’s strength primarily comes from the carbon steel core, it is generally less robust than stainless steel. The added zinc layer doesn’t significantly contribute to its strength. Galvanized steel is suitable for medium-duty applications where corrosion resistance is necessary but not in extreme or high-stress environments.

4. Appearance and Aesthetics

Stainless Steel

Stainless steel has a sleek, shiny appearance and is often desirable in architectural applications and visible installations. Its aesthetic appeal and durability make it a preferred choice for high-visibility structures and equipment.

Galvanized Steel

The zinc layer gives galvanized steel a dull, matte-gray finish less visually appealing than stainless steel. Over time, exposure to weather may lead to a whitish patina on the surface, which can reduce aesthetic appeal, though it doesn’t impact performance.

5. Cost Considerations

Stainless Steel

Stainless steel is typically more expensive due to its alloying elements, chromium and nickel, and complex manufacturing processes. However, its longer lifespan and minimal maintenance can offset the initial cost, especially in demanding environments.

Galvanized Steel

Galvanized steel is more economical than stainless steel, especially for short- to medium-term applications. It’s a cost-effective choice for projects with a limited budget and moderate corrosion resistance needs.

6. Typical Applications

Stainless Steel Applications

Oil and Gas: Used in pipelines, storage tanks, and offshore platforms due to its high corrosion resistance and strength.
Chemical Processing: Excellent for environments where exposure to acidic or caustic chemicals is every day.
Marine Engineering: Stainless steel’s resistance to saltwater makes it suitable for marine applications like docks, vessels, and equipment.
Infrastructure: Ideal for bridges, railings, and architectural structures where durability and aesthetics are essential.

Galvanized Steel Applications

General Construction: Commonly used in building frames, fences, and roofing supports.
Agricultural Equipment: Provides a balance of corrosion resistance and cost-effectiveness for equipment exposed to soil and moisture.
Water Treatment Facilities: Suitable for non-critical water infrastructure, such as piping and storage tanks in low-corrosion environments.
Outdoor Structures: Commonly used in road barriers, guardrails, and poles, where exposure to mild weather conditions is expected.

7. Maintenance and Longevity

Stainless Steel

Stainless steel requires minimal maintenance due to its inherent corrosion resistance. However, in harsh environments, periodic cleaning is recommended to remove salt, chemicals, or deposits that could compromise the protective oxide layer over time.

Galvanized Steel

Galvanized steel requires regular inspection and maintenance to keep the zinc layer intact. If the zinc layer is scratched or degraded, re-galvanizing or additional coatings may be necessary to prevent corrosion. This is particularly important in marine or industrial applications, where the zinc layer is at risk of degrading faster.

8. Example: Stainless Steel vs Galvanized Steel

PROPERTY STAINLESS STEEL (316) GALVANISED STEEL COMPARISON
Mechanism of protection A protective oxide layer that self-repairs in the presence of oxygen, granting long-term corrosion resistance. A protective zinc coating is applied to the steel during manufacturing. When damaged, surrounding zinc cathodically protects the exposed steel. The stainless steel protective layer is more durable and can ‘heal’ itself. Stainless steel protection does not diminish with material loss or thickness reduction.
Appearance Many finishes are available, from very bright electropolished to abrasive linished. Appealing high-quality look and feel. Spangles possible. The surface is not bright and gradually changes to a dull grey with age. Aesthetic design choice.
Surface feel It is very smooth and can be slippery. It has a coarser feel, which becomes more apparent with age. Aesthetic design choice.
Green credentials It may be reused in new structures. After the lifetime of the structure, it is valuable as scrap, and because of its collection value, it has a high recycling rate. Carbon steel is generally scrapped at end-of-life and is less valuable. Stainless steel is extensively recycled both within manufacturing and at end-of-life. All new stainless steel contains a substantial proportion of recycled steel.
Heavy metal runoff Negligible levels. Significant zinc runoff off, especially early in life. Some European highways have been changed to stainless steel railings to avoid environmental zinc contamination.
Lifetime Indefinite, provided surface is maintained. Slow general corrosion until the zinc dissolves. Red rust will appear as the zinc/iron layer corrodes, and finally, the substrate steel. Repair is required before ~2% of the surface has red spots. Clear life-cycle cost benefit for stainless steel if extended life intended. The economic break-even point can be as short as six years, depending on the environment and other factors.
Fire resistance Excellent for austenitic stainless steels with reasonable strength and deflection during fires. Zinc melts and runs, which may cause the failure of adjacent stainless steel in a chemical plant. The carbon steel substrate loses strength and suffers deflection. Stainless steel offers better fire resistance and avoids the risk of molten zinc if galvanised is used.
Welding on site This is a routine for austenitic stainless steels, with care about thermal expansion. Welds can be blended into the surrounding metal surface. Post-weld clean-up and passivation are essential. Carbon steel is readily self-weldable, but zinc must be removed because of fumes. If galvanised and stainless steel are welded together, any zinc residue will embrittle the stainless steel. Zinc-rich paint is less durable than galvanizing. In severe marine environments, crusty rust can appear in three to five years, and steel attacks occur at four years/mm afterward. Short-term durability is similar, but a zinc-rich coating at joins requires upkeep. In severe conditions, galvanized steel will get rough rust—even holes—and possible hand injury, especially from the unseen seaward side.
Contact with damp, porous material (e.g., wooden wedges) in a salty environment. It will likely cause rust stains and crevice attack but not structural failure. Similar to storage stains, it leads to rapid zinc loss and longer-term due to perforation. It is not desirable for either, but it can cause failure at the base of galvanized poles in the long term.
Maintenance It can suffer from tea staining and micro-pitting if not adequately maintained. It can suffer general zinc loss and subsequent corrosion of the steel substrate if not adequately maintained. Rain in open areas or washing in sheltered regions is required for both.
ASTM A335 ASME SA335 P92 SMLS PIPE

Microstructure Evolution of P92 Steel at Different Isothermal Temperatures

Microstructure Evolution of P92 Steel at Different Isothermal Temperatures

P92 steel is mainly used in ultra-supercritical boilers, ultra-high-pressure pipelines, and other high-temperature and high-pressure equipment.P92 steel is in the P91 steel chemical composition based on the addition of trace elements of W and B elements, reduces the content of Mo, through the grain boundaries of the strengthened and dispersion strengthened in a variety of ways, to improve the comprehensive performance of the P92 steel, P92 steel than the P91 steel has better resistance to oxidation performance and corrosion resistance. A hot working process is essential for producing the P92 steel pipe. Thermal processing technology can eliminate the internal defects generated in the production process and make the steel performance meet the needs of working conditions. The type and state of the organization in the hot working process are the key factors influencing the performance to meet the standard. Therefore, this paper analyzes the organization of P92 steel pipe at different isothermal temperatures to reveal the organization evolution of P92 steel pipe at various temperatures, which not only provides information support for the organization analysis and performance control of the actual hot working process but also lays the experimental basis for the development of the hot working process.

1. Test Materials and Methods

1.1 Test Material

The tested steel is a P92 steel pipe in use condition (1060 ℃ hardened + 760 ℃ tempered), and its chemical composition is shown in Table 1. A cylindrical specimen of ϕ4 mm × 10 mm was cut in the middle part of the finished pipe at a particular position along the length direction, and the quenching expansion meter was used to study the tissue transformation at different temperatures.

Table 1 Main Chemical Composition of P92 Steel by Mass Fraction (%)

Element C Si Mn Cr Ni Mo V Al B Nb W Fe
% 0.13 0.2 0.42 8.67 0.25 0.48 0.19 0.008 0.002 0.05 1.51 Balance

1.2 Test Process

Using L78 quenching thermal expansion meter, 0.05 ℃ / s warming up to 1050 ℃ insulation 15min, 200 ℃ / s cooling down to room temperature. Measure the critical point of phase change of the material Ac1 is 792.4℃, Ac3 is 879.8℃, Ms is 372.3℃. The specimens were heated up to 1050°C at a rate of 10°C/s and held for 15 min, and then cooled down to different temperatures (770, 740, 710, 680, 650, 620, 520, 430, 400, 370, 340, 310, 280, 250, 190, and 160°C) at a rate of 150°C/s and held for different periods of time (620°C and below for 1h, 620°C and above for 25h). 620 ℃ and above holding 25h), the isothermal end of the power is off so that the specimen is air-cooled to room temperature.1.3 Test methods

After grinding and polishing the surface of the specimens under different processes, the surface of the specimens was corroded using aqua regia. AXIOVERT 25 Zeiss microscope and QWANTA 450 environmental scanning electron microscope were used to observe and analyze the organization; using HVS-50 Vickers hardness tester (load weight of 1kg), hardness measurements were made at several locations on the surface of each specimen and the average value was taken as the hardness value of the specimen.

2. Test Results and Analysis

2.1 Organization and Analysis of Different Isothermal Temperature

Figure 1 shows the microstructure of P92 steel after complete austenitization at 1050°C for different times at different temperatures. Figure 1(a) shows the microstructure of P92 steel after isothermalization at 190℃ for 1h. From Fig. 1(a2), it can be seen that its room temperature organization is martensite (M). From Fig. 1(a3 ), it can be seen that the martensite shows lath-like characteristics. Since the Ms point of the steel is about 372°C, the martensite phase transformation occurs at isothermal temperatures below the Ms point, forming martensite, and the carbon content of the P92 steel belongs to the range of low carbon compositions; a lath-like morphology characterizes the martensite.

Figure 1(a) shows the microstructure of P92 steel after 1h isothermal at 190°C

Figure 1(a) shows the microstructure of P92 steel after 1h isothermal at 190°C

Figure 1(b) for the microstructure of P92 steel at 430 ℃ isothermal 1h. As the isothermal temperature increases to 430°C, P92 steel reaches the bainite transformation zone. Since the steel contains Mo, B, and W elements, these elements have little effect on the bainite transformation while delaying the pearlitic transformation. Therefore, P92 steel at 430 ℃ insulation 1h, the organization of a certain amount of bainite. Then the remaining supercooled austenite is transformed into martensite when air-cooled.

Figure 1(b) for the microstructure of P92 steel at 430 ℃ isothermal 1h

Figure 1(b) for the microstructure of P92 steel at 430 ℃ isothermal 1h

Figure 1(c) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 520 ℃ isothermal 1h. When the isothermal temperature of 520 ℃, the alloying elements Cr, Mo, Mn, etc., so that the pearlite transformation is inhibited, the start of the bainite transformation point (Bs point) is reduced, so in a specific range of temperatures will appear in the stabilization zone of the supercooled austenite. Figure 1(c) can be seen in 520 ℃ insulation 1h after supercooled austenite did not occur after the transformation, followed by air cooling to form martensite; the final room temperature organization is the martensite.

Figure 1(c) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 520 ℃ isothermal 1h

Figure 1(c) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 520 ℃ isothermal 1h

Figure 1 (d) for the P92 steel at 650 ℃ isothermal 25h microstructure for martensite + pearlite. As shown in Figure 1(d3), pearlite shows discontinuous lamellar characteristics, and the carbide on the surface shows a short rod precipitation. This is due to the P92 steel alloying elements Cr, Mo, V, etc. to improve the stability of supercooled austenite at the same time so that the P92 steel pearlite morphology changes, that is, the carbide in the pearlitic body of the carbide for the short rod, this pearlitic body is known as the class pearlite. At the same time, many fine second-phase particles were found in the organization.

Figure 1 (d) for the P92 steel at 650 ℃ isothermal 25h microstructure for martensite + pearlite

Figure 1 (d) for the P92 steel at 650 ℃ isothermal 25h microstructure for martensite + pearlite

Figure 1(e) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 740 ℃ isothermal 25h. At 740°C isothermal, there will be first eutectic massive ferrite precipitation and then austenite eutectic decomposition, resulting in pearlite-like organization. Compared with the 650°C isothermal (see Fig. 1(d3)), the pearlitic organization becomes coarser as the isothermal temperature is increased, and the two-phase character of pearlite, i.e., ferrite and carburite in the form of a short bar, is clearly visible.

Figure 1(e) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 740 ℃ isothermal 25h

Figure 1(e) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 740 ℃ isothermal 25h

Fig. 1(f) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 770°C isothermal temperature for 25h. At 770°C isothermal, with the extension of the isothermal time, the precipitation of ferrite occurs first, and then the supercooled austenite undergoes eutectic decomposition to form a ferrite + pearlite organization. With the increase of isothermal temperature, the first eutectic ferrite content increases, and the pearlite content decreases. Because of the P92 steel alloying elements, alloying elements dissolved into the austenite to make the austenite hardenability increase, the difficulty of the eutectic decomposition becomes more extensive, so there must be a sufficiently long isothermal time to make its eutectic decomposition, the formation of the pearlitic organization.

Fig. 1(f) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 770°C isothermal temperature for 25h

Fig. 1(f) shows the microstructure of P92 steel at 770°C isothermal temperature for 25h

Energy spectrum analysis was performed on the tissues with different morphologies in Fig. 1(f2) to identify the tissue type further, as shown in Table 2. From Table 2, it can be seen that the carbon content of the white particles is higher than other organizations, and the alloying elements Cr, Mo, and V are more, analyzing this particle for the composite carbide particles precipitated during the cooling process; comparatively speaking, the carbon content in the discontinuous lamellar organization is second to the lowest, and the carbon content in the massive organization is the least. Because pearlite is a two-phase organization of carburize and ferrite, the average carbon content is higher than that of ferrite; combined with isothermal temperature and morphology analysis, it is further determined that the lamellar organization is pearlite-like, and the massive organization is first eutectic ferrite.

Spectrum Analysis Of The P92 Steel, Isothermally Treated At 770 °C For 25 Hours, Written In Table Format With Atom Fractions (%)

Structure C Nb Mo Ti V Cr Mn Fe W
White Granules 11.07 0.04 0.94 0.02 2.16 8.36 2.64 54.77 2.84
Block Structure 9.31 0.04 0.95 0.2 0.32 8.42 0.74 85.51 10.21
Layered Structure 5.1 0 0.09 0.1 0.33 7.3 0.35 85.65 0.69

2.2 Microhardness and Analysis

Generally speaking, during the cooling process of alloy steels containing elements such as W and Mo, three kinds of organizational transformations occur in the supercooled austenite: martensitic transformation in the low-temperature zone, bainite transformation in the medium-temperature zone, and pearlite transformation in the high-temperature zone. The different organizational evolutions lead to different hardnesses. Figure 2 shows the variation of the hardness curve of P92 steel at different isothermal temperatures. From Fig. 2, it can be seen that with the increase of isothermal temperature, the hardness shows the trend of decreasing first, then increasing, and finally decreasing. When the isothermal temperature of 160 ~ 370 ℃, the occurrence of martensitic transformation, Vickers hardness from 516HV to 457HV. When the isothermal temperature is 400 ~ 620 ℃, a small amount of bainite transformation occurs, and the hardness of 478HV increases to 484HV; due to the small bainite transformation, the hardness does not change much. When the isothermal temperature is 650 ℃, a small amount of pearlite forms, with a hardness of 410HV. when the isothermal temperature of 680 ~ 770 ℃, the formation of ferrite + pearlite organization, hardness from 242HV to 163HV. due to the transformation of P92 steel at different temperatures in the organization of the transition is different, in the region of the low-temperature martensitic transformation, when the isothermal temperature is lower than the point of Ms, with the increase in temperature, martensite content decreases, hardness decreases; in the middle of the transformation of P92 steel in the different temperatures, when the isothermal temperature is lower than the Ms point, with the temperature increase, martensitic content decreases, the hardness decreases; in the medium-temperature bainite transformation region, because the amount of bainite transformation is small, the hardness does not change much; in the high-temperature pearlitic transformation region, with the rise of isothermal temperature, the first eutectic ferrite content increases so that the hardness continues to decline, so with the increase in isothermal temperature, the material hardness is generally a decreasing trend, and the trend of the change in hardness and the analysis of the organization is in line with the trend.

Variation Of Hardness Curves Of P92 Steel At Different Isothermal Temperatures

Variation Of Hardness Curves Of P92 Steel At Different Isothermal Temperatures

3. Conclusion

1) The critical point Ac1 of P92 steel is 792.4 ℃, Ac3 is 879.8 ℃, and Ms is 372.3 ℃.

2) P92 steel at different isothermal temperatures to obtain the room temperature organization is different; in the 160 ~ 370 ℃ isothermal 1h, the room temperature organization is martensite; in the 400 ~ 430 ℃ isothermal 1h, the organization of a small amount of bainite + martensite; in the 520 ~ 620 ℃ isothermal 1h, the organization is relatively stable, a short period of time (1 h) does not occur within the transformation, the room temperature organization is martensite; in the 650 ℃ isothermal 25h, the room temperature organization is pearlite. h, room temperature organization for pearlite + martensite; in 680 ~ 770 ℃ isothermal 25h, the organization transformed into pearlite + first eutectic ferrite.

3) P92 steel austenitization in Ac1 below isothermal, with the reduction of isothermal temperature, the hardness of the material as a whole tends to increase, isothermal at 770 ℃ after the occurrence of the first eutectic ferrite precipitation, pearlitic transformation, hardness is the lowest, about 163HV; isothermal at 160 ℃ after the occurrence of the martensitic transformation, hardness is the highest, about 516HV.

ASME B31.3 vs ASME B31.1

ASME B31.1 vs. ASME B31.3: Know the Piping Design Codes

Introduction

In piping design and engineering, selecting the appropriate piping code is essential for ensuring safety, efficiency, and compliance with industry standards. Two of the most widely recognized piping design codes are ASME B31.1 and ASME B31.3. While they both come from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and govern the design and construction of piping systems, their applications differ significantly. Understanding the ASME B31.1 vs. ASME B31.3 debate is crucial for selecting the correct code for your project, whether it involves power plants, chemical processing, or industrial facilities.

This blog will provide a detailed, easy-to-understand comparison of ASME B31.1 and ASME B31.3, addressing key differences, applications, and practical considerations to help you make an informed decision for your piping design.

Overview: ASME B31.1 vs. ASME B31.3

ASME B31.1: Power Piping Code

ASME B31.1 is the standard that governs the design, construction, and maintenance of power plant piping systems. It applies to piping systems in power plants, industrial plants, and other facilities where power generation is involved. This code focuses heavily on the integrity of systems that handle high-pressure steam, water, and hot gases.

  • Typical Applications: Power plants, heating systems, turbines, and boiler systems.
  • Pressure Range: High-pressure steam and fluid systems.
  • Temperature Range: High-temperature service, especially for steam and gas applications.

ASME B31.3: Process Piping Code

ASME B31.3, on the other hand, applies to the design and construction of piping systems used in chemical, petrochemical, and pharmaceutical industries. It governs systems that transport chemicals, gases, or liquids under different pressure and temperature conditions, often including hazardous materials. This code also covers the associated support systems and the safety considerations of handling chemicals and dangerous substances.

  • Typical Applications: Chemical processing plants, refineries, pharmaceutical facilities, food and beverage plants.
  • Pressure Range: Generally lower than the pressure range in ASME B31.1, depending on fluid types and their classification.
  • The Temperature Range varies depending on the chemical fluids, but it is typically lower than the extreme conditions in ASME B31.1.

Critical Differences: ASME B31.1 vs. ASME B31.3

ASME B31.3 vs ASME B31.1

ASME B31.3 vs ASME B31.1

1. System Types and Fluid Handling

The comparison of ASME B31.1 vs. ASME B31.3 often depends on the type of system and the fluids being handled.

  • ASME B31.1 covers high-pressure systems such as those found in power generation facilities, where steam and gases are typically handled.
  • ASME B31.3 governs piping systems that handle chemicals, gases, and other fluids, where material compatibility and safety are paramount due to the hazardous nature of the contents.

In ASME B31.3, special consideration is given to ensuring that piping systems can safely contain potentially corrosive or hazardous fluids and managing the pressure and temperature variations inherent in chemical processes. In contrast, ASME B31.1 focuses more on thermal stresses from high-temperature systems like steam boilers.

2. Material Selection and Design Considerations

One of the more notable distinctions between ASME B31.1 and ASME B31.3 is the approach to material selection:

  • ASME B31.1 may use carbon steel, stainless steel, and alloys, which can withstand high-pressure steam and gas applications.
  • ASME B31.3 demands more stringent considerations for chemical compatibility. Material selection must account for potential corrosive environments, and materials such as duplex stainless steels, nickel alloys, and even non-metallic piping systems may be required.

Furthermore, ASME B31.3 requires specific attention to stress analysis, including factors like thermal expansion, pressure fluctuations, and potentially hazardous or volatile materials. At the same time, ASME B31.1 primarily addresses mechanical stresses from high-temperature and high-pressure conditions.

3. Design Flexibility and Safety Protocols

In terms of design flexibility:

  • ASME B31.1 focuses on the system’s mechanical integrity, ensuring the piping can withstand extreme mechanical stresses during operation.
  • ASME B31.3 incorporates more safety features, especially those that prevent leaks or failures in systems handling hazardous materials. The code places significant emphasis on the design of flexible joints, expansion loops, and safety valves, primarily for chemical processes.

Safety in ASME B31.3 also includes provisions for the safe handling of materials that could be toxic or hazardous, with more emphasis on pressure relief devices and emergency venting systems.

4. Welding and Inspection Requirements

Welding and inspection practices are critical in both standards, but with crucial differences:

  • ASME B31.1 includes welding and inspection guidelines tailored for power plants, specifically for high-temperature, high-pressure systems.
  • ASME B31.3, more focused on chemical and process industries, requires more extensive non-destructive testing (NDT) methods and higher-quality welding practices to ensure leak-proof systems. It also addresses concerns regarding welding materials that could become brittle at lower temperatures or react to specific chemical environments.

Both codes require rigorous inspection, but ASME B31.3 may include more frequent or stricter testing protocols due to the risks associated with transporting hazardous materials.

5. Code Compliance and Documentation

Both codes emphasize the need for thorough documentation throughout the lifecycle of the project, but they approach this in different ways:

  • ASME B31.1 documents the design, fabrication, testing, and maintenance of power piping systems.
  • ASME B31.3 requires systems’ responsive documentation for material traceability, chemical compatibility reports, and more detailed records for pressure testing and inspection procedures.

This documentation is necessary to meet regulatory standards and is crucial in ensuring long-term operational safety and reliability.

Practical Considerations for Choosing: ASME B31.1 vs. ASME B31.3

1. Project Type and Industry

The most straightforward consideration is the type of project you are working on. For power plants or industrial heating systems, ASME B31.1 is the appropriate choice due to the high-pressure steam and hot gases involved. For chemical plants, refineries, or any project involving hazardous chemicals, ASME B31.3 is the standard to follow, as it addresses the specific risks and requirements of chemical processing.

2. Piping Materials and Fluid Types

Consider the materials used and the type of fluids transported. ASME provides the required guidelines for dealing with steam, hot gases, or water at high pressure. If your system involves chemicals, volatile gases, or hazardous liquids, ASME B31.3 will guide you toward appropriate material choices and design methods to protect personnel and the environment.

3. Safety and Regulatory Compliance

Both standards are designed to promote safety, but the risk and regulatory compliance required in ASME B31.3 is higher due to the nature of chemicals and hazardous materials transported. If your project involves handling these materials, it’s essential to follow ASME B31.3 guidelines to mitigate the risk of lit, corrosion, and catastrophic failures.

Conclusion

The critical difference in the ASME B31.1 vs. ASME B31.3 debate lies in the industry applications, material requirements, and safety considerations. ASME B31.1 is ideal for power generation and high-temperature systems, focusing on mechanical integrity. At the same time, ASME B31.3 is tailored for the chemical and process industries, emphasizing the safe handling of hazardous materials and chemical compatibility.

By understanding the distinctions between these two standards, you can decide which code best suits your project’s requirements, ensuring compliance and safety throughout the project’s lifecycle. Whether you are involved in power plant design or system’ processing, choosing the correct piping code is crucial for a successful project.